The Imperative for Indian Mediation in the Ukraine War

This article advocates for India to actively mediate in the Ukraine-Russia war, highlighting the flawed notion that India should wait until it is more powerful. Given India’s favorable position with key global players, the article emphasizes the timing for mediation, India’s acceptance as a neutral party, and the potential benefits for India’s foreign policy. It concludes that taking a proactive role in mediation aligns with India’s aspirations for global leadership.

The notion that India should postpone its mediation efforts in global conflicts, including the Russia-Ukraine war, until it attains greater power is flawed. The Indian external affairs ministry has expressed willingness to assist in finding peaceful solutions to the Ukraine crisis, suggesting that New Delhi should now actively facilitate the end of hostilities between Russia and Ukraine.

India’s strategy of avoiding condemnation of Russia, balancing relations with both Russia and the West, has produced positive outcomes. Presently, New Delhi’s strategic decisions reflect a moment of satisfaction, yet in this evolving global arena, India cannot afford to remain passive. The ongoing negotiations in Riyadh represent a pivotal moment for India’s involvement amid perceptions that these discussions have not progressed significantly.

There are three compelling reasons for India to mediate now. Firstly, the timing is propitious, with Russia eager to relieve sanctions and engage in discussions with the US, which are currently taking place in Riyadh. While the Trump administration may lift sanctions, the European response remains uncertain; hence, incorporating European interests in security discussions is essential.

Secondly, India enjoys acceptability among most key players in this geopolitical conflict, positioning it as a neutral facilitator. Compared to China, for which there is considerable skepticism, India is viewed favorably by both parties, thus enhancing its potential role as a mediator.

Lastly, India’s involvement in mediation serves its national interests, aligning with its aspirations to become a prominent global power. Successful mediation could open doors to stronger relationships with various countries. In the context of a possible ceasefire, Indian peacekeepers may be well-suited to maintain peace, given their experience and neutrality.

Conversely, three key factors are impeding India’s engagement. The principal concern is the fear of failure; however, the prospect of geopolitical gains, influence, and status should outweigh this apprehension. Moreover, third-party facilitation is not merely about ending the war, but rather about enabling conversations among conflicting parties.

In practical terms, India could appoint a special envoy to engage with key stakeholders, exploring their positions and offering Indian soil as a neutral ground for negotiations. It should be noted that India’s international economic standing—3.5 times the GDP of Turkey and significantly higher than that of Saudi Arabia or Qatar—demonstrates that geopolitical influence hinges on willingness rather than mere economic metrics.

Thus, as India reflects on its role in global conflicts, the time has come for it to take initiative in mediating peace, instead of continually relying on external parties.

In conclusion, India stands at a crucial juncture where it can play an instrumental role in mediating the Ukraine-Russia war. With positive timing, acceptability, and the opportunity to advance its national interests, India has compelling reasons to engage. By overcoming fears of failure and taking decisive steps towards facilitation, India can assert itself on the global stage, fostering peace while enhancing its influence. Stepping into this role will not only benefit the conflicting parties but will also align with India’s aspirations for prominence in international affairs.

Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com