Sudan Alleges UAE Violates Genocide Convention as Conflict Escalates

Sudan has brought a legal case against the UAE, alleging breaches of the Genocide Convention through support for rebels. The ongoing conflict has led to over 24,000 deaths and significant displacement of the population. The UAE is accused of arming rebel factions despite denials. This filing follows the establishment of a rival government by the RSF and recent U.S. sanctions on RSF leadership.

Sudan has filed a case against the United Arab Emirates (UAE) at the International Court of Justice, accusing it of violating the Genocide Convention by supporting rebel groups. In its legal request, Sudan has called for urgent provisional measures to compel the UAE to act against the ongoing violence targeting the Masalit ethnic group.

The conflict in Sudan escalated in mid-April 2023, stemming from disputes between military and paramilitary forces in Khartoum, leading to significant casualties and displacement. Reports indicate that over 24,000 individuals have lost their lives, and an estimated 14 million people have fled their homes, accounting for about 30% of the nation’s population. Moreover, approximately 3.2 million Sudanese have sought refuge in neighboring countries, as per United Nations reports.

This submission to the world court occurred shortly after the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and allied groups established a framework for a rival government, coinciding with advances by Sudanese military forces. A group monitoring the conflict, the Conflict Observatory, has reported on transfers of arms from the UAE to the RSF, and noted that such shipments have been incorrectly attributed to hospital support by the UAE.

In January, the U.S. Treasury imposed sanctions on RSF leader Mohammad Hamdan Daglo Mousa, known as Hemedti, alongside several RSF-owned firms in the UAE, amid findings that the RSF is engaging in genocide. The UAE, while being an ally of the U.S., has faced repeated accusations of providing military support to the RSF, which it firmly denies despite substantial evidence.

The legacy of conflict in Sudan particularly recalls the genocide and atrocities witnessed in the Darfur region two decades ago, where the Janjaweed militia perpetrated heinous acts against Central and East African populations, resulting in substantial loss of life and displacement.

It is significant to note that decisions made by the International Court of Justice are binding but may take years to conclude.

In conclusion, Sudan’s legal action against the UAE at the International Court of Justice highlights significant concerns regarding violations of the Genocide Convention and ongoing violence against ethnic groups. The conflict has led to extensive loss of life and displacement, drawing international attention. Ultimately, the outcome of this case may have profound implications for both Sudan and the UAE.

Original Source: battlefordsnow.com