Iran’s Advisor Critiques Turkey’s Diplomacy and Foresees Regional Turmoil

Ali Akbar Velayati, advisor to Iran’s leader, criticized Turkey’s diplomatic stance, emphasized Iran’s values of mutual respect, and warned about Syria’s instability due to external military involvement. He condemned Trump’s actions concerning Gaza and predicted the collapse of the EU, attributing it to rising tensions and divisions within Europe.

In a recent interview with Jam-e Jam, Ali Akbar Velayati, advisor to Iran’s Supreme Leader, criticized Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan’s assertion that Iran’s foreign policy is “very dangerous,” contending that such views are misguided. Velayati reiterated Iran’s commitment to principles of mutual respect and urged Turkey to avoid actions that may jeopardize their longstanding relationships.

Velayati also voiced significant concerns regarding the ongoing instability in Syria, attributing it primarily to the influence of armed groups such as Daesh and Kurdish factions, along with the military intervention of Israeli and American forces. He warned of the looming threat of a civil war exacerbated by Israeli tactics aimed at creating divisions within Syria based on ethnic and religious lines.

Moreover, Velayati condemned former U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to relocate Gazans, describing it as “thoughtless” and impractical, arguing that it reflects Trump’s tendency for fear-mongering rather than actionable policy initiatives.

Additionally, he forecasted an impending collapse of the European Union, pointing to the increasing tensions between the United States and Europe fueled by the Ukraine conflict. He observed that Trump’s cooperation with Russia has intensified divisions within Europe, particularly affecting the United Kingdom’s position within the EU.

In summary, Velayati’s remarks highlight his concerns regarding the diplomatic conduct of Turkey, the fragility of Syria amidst ongoing conflict, and the predicted downfall of the EU, linking these issues to broader geopolitical dynamics. His criticisms reflect a deep apprehension about regional stability and international relations, particularly in light of foreign interventions and leadership approaches.

Original Source: ifpnews.com