Saudi Arabia and Qatar Condemn RSF’s Parallel Government Charter in Sudan

Kenya’s support for the RSF’s charter to create a parallel government in Sudan has drawn criticism from Middle Eastern nations, notably Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Both countries rejected the initiative, emphasizing the importance of Sudan’s stability and national unity while calling for adherence to the Jeddah Declaration. Their responses underscore apprehensions about the potential implications of the charter on Sudan’s internal affairs.

Kenya’s diplomatic position faced scrutiny after it supported the signing of a charter by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), aimed at establishing a parallel government in Sudan. This charter, formally adopted in Nairobi, has elicited sharp criticism from key Middle Eastern partners, specifically Qatar and Saudi Arabia, who expressed concerns about its implications for Sudan’s political unity.

Saudi Arabia issued a statement rejecting any steps taken outside Sudan to establish a parallel government, emphasizing the need for actions aligned with the country’s official institutions. They underscored the significance of the Jeddah Declaration from May 2023, calling on parties involved in the conflict to prioritize Sudan’s interests and work towards stability and peace.

Similarly, Qatar condemned any interference in Sudan’s domestic affairs, reinforcing its support for the country’s unity and sovereignty. The Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged all stakeholders to focus on the greater national interest to prevent division, advocating for an inclusive dialogue that promotes lasting peace and fulfills the aspirations of the Sudanese people.

The recent signing of the RSF’s charter, which advocates for a secular state and a unified national army in Sudan, poses a potential risk to the country’s internal stability. While the charter acknowledges the existence of armed groups, it stresses the need for a democratic and decentralized state structure, raising further concerns among the international community.

The situation surrounding Sudan’s political landscape highlights significant geopolitical tensions, especially concerning external influences from key nations such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Their condemnations of the RSF’s charter reflect concerns over Sudan’s territorial integrity and call for adherence to national unity. The outcome of the RSF’s actions and international responses will significantly shape the future of Sudan’s governance and stability.

Original Source: www.kenyans.co.ke