Implications of Trump’s Transactional Foreign Policy for Nepal

The clash between Trump and Zelensky has raised concerns in Nepal regarding the implications of the US’s transactional foreign policy. Experts warn that Nepal must approach agreements cautiously, as concessions may be demanded. Former officials emphasize the need for Nepal to adapt its foreign strategies to the changing geopolitical landscape, stressing that strong relationships with neighboring countries are essential for safeguarding national interests.

The recent confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has raised concerns in Nepal regarding the implications of Trump’s ‘transactional’ foreign policy. Experts caution that Nepal should approach future agreements with caution, as concessions may increasingly be sought from smaller nations. “Who knows if Nepal will be pressured to compromise on its policy stance?” remarked a retired diplomat, highlighting the necessity for Nepal to recognize its sovereignty while maintaining cordial relations globally.

In the backdrop of Trump’s insistence on Ukraine’s mineral deal as a form of repayment for military aid, his criticisms of Zelensky reveal a preference for quid pro quo negotiations. Trump expressed dissatisfaction with Zelensky’s perceived lack of gratitude and labeled him as “unprepared for peace” during their interaction. This situation accentuates the need for Nepal to reassess its foreign policy dynamics in light of rapidly shifting international relations.

Former Foreign Minister Ramesh Nath Pandey emphasized the importance of adapting Nepal’s diplomatic strategies to fit the evolving global landscape driven by major powers’ national interests. He stated, “As the US pursues a more ‘business-oriented’ diplomacy, Nepal must rethink its foreign policy.” This perspective underscores the significance of careful navigation through changing geopolitical dynamics,

Political leaders in Nepal are keenly observing the implications arising from the Trump-Zelensky meeting. CPN-UML General Secretary Shankar Pokharel noted the critical lessons for Nepal, advocating for stronger bilateral relations with neighboring countries. He highlighted that even powerful nations face challenges when their connections with neighbors stagnate, urging a broader continental alliance among Asian nations.

Experts advise caution in foreign policy decisions amidst the worrying trend of economic rivalries posing new forms of geopolitical conflict. Former Minister Pandey asserted that geography should guide international diplomacy judiciously. Analysts argue that the geopolitical tensions between Washington, New Delhi, and Beijing will profoundly impact Nepal, mandating a strategic approach to navigate these challenges effectively.

With growing apprehension towards the Trump administration’s focus on economic interests within its diplomatic engagements, experts emphasize the need for Nepal to recognize its geographic realities. Dr. Dinesh Bhattarai concluded that every foreign policy decision must stem from a thorough understanding of these realities to safeguard national interests.

In summary, Nepal faces significant challenges in an evolving international landscape shaped by powerful nations’ ‘transactional’ foreign policies. The current dynamics necessitate a reevaluation of Nepal’s diplomatic strategies to ensure national sovereignty while navigating complex geopolitical relationships. The situation emphasizes the importance of prioritizing regional alliances and adapting foreign policy to the realities of international relations, particularly amid the potential for economic-driven conflicts.

Original Source: myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com