Global news
ABDALLA HAMDOK, AFRICA, AL - HADI IDRIS, CENTRAL AFRICA, CIVIL WAR, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, HUMANITARIAN CRISIS, IBRAHIM AL - MIRGHANI, ID, IDRIS, KENYA, NAIROBI, REUTERS, RSF, SECURITY, SOVEREIGNTY, SUDAN ’ S RAPID SUPPORT FORCES, SUDANESE COORDINATION OF CIVIL DEMOCRATIC FORCES, TAQADDUM, UNITED NATIONS
Marcus Li
0 Comments
RSF’s Strategy to Fortify Its Power After Establishing a Government in Nairobi
Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) are consolidating power by establishing a parallel government in Nairobi, positioning themselves as the rightful government of Sudan amid their conflict with the Sudanese army. They aim to gain international legitimacy through diplomatic channels and partnerships, despite concerns about their oppressive history. The situation raises diplomatic tensions involving Kenya, which has been accused of bias, complicating the regional political landscape.
Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), after establishing a parallel government in Nairobi, are intensifying their hold on power as part of a broader strategy to legitimize their authority. Amid an ongoing conflict with Sudan’s army, the RSF is pivoting toward diplomatic efforts to reinforce its role as a central figure in the country’s governance, as insiders reveal insights into their plans.
Authorities have disclosed that the RSF, claiming to be the legitimate government of Sudan, intends to leverage international platforms like the United Nations to undermine the Sudanese Army’s authority and gain legitimacy. Ibrahim al-Mirghani, a politician supporting the new RSF-led government, emphasized that securing the nation would lead to recognition from neighboring countries.
The RSF aims to present itself as the face of Sudan’s civilian transition while bolstering military power. Collaborating with political group Taqaddum, the RSF is attempting to redefine its image from a militia to a credible governing body. Al-Hadi Idris, head of an armed faction allied with the RSF, stated their focus on peace while also asserting their right to procure advanced military equipment for national defense.
Last month, the RSF formalized its intentions by signing a political charter with various political parties and armed factions in Nairobi, which would lay the foundation for a parallel government, referred to as the ‘Government of Peace and Unity.’ Recent declarations from RSF leaders affirm their stance as the legitimate government of Sudan, contesting the Sudanese Army’s claim to authority.
The Nairobi signing event, organized by the Sudanese Coordination of Civil Democratic Forces led by former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, was hailed as a pivotal step toward a civilian-led, democratic Sudan. Critics, however, label it as a strategic maneuver by RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, aimed at securing recognition and legitimacy on the international stage.
In response to the Nairobi event, Sudan’s military leadership condemned the proceedings, accusing Kenya of bias in the ongoing conflict. The Sudanese government warned against Kenya’s involvement in what it views as internal matters, stating that the host nation has favored one side in the conflict.
The RSF’s reputation, marred by accusations of war crimes and human rights abuses, raises questions about their commitment to establishing a democratic regime. A United Nations report has documented severe violations attributed to RSF forces, suggesting that their recent diplomatic endeavors may merely serve as a facade for authoritarian pursuits.
Kenya’s facilitation of the RSF’s charter signing has drawn criticism from the Sudanese army, which perceives it as an infringement upon its sovereignty. While the diplomatic rift has escalated, with Khartoum expelling Kenya’s ambassador, Kenyan officials maintain their efforts are aimed at promoting regional stability rather than choosing sides in the conflict.
In summary, the Rapid Support Forces’ establishment of a parallel government in Nairobi marks a critical maneuver in their quest for legitimacy amidst ongoing conflict in Sudan. Their diplomatic efforts, despite facing skepticism regarding their intentions, signify an attempt to reposition themselves as the legitimate governing authority. The unfolding situation poses challenges for regional politics, particularly with Kenya’s controversial facilitation of RSF-led initiatives, leaving significant implications for Sudan’s future stability.
Original Source: www.kenyans.co.ke
Post Comment