Israeli Forces to Remain in Southern Lebanon: Defense Minister’s Announcement

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced the indefinite presence of Israeli forces in a buffer zone in southern Lebanon. This decision follows a ceasefire agreement that specified a timeline for withdrawal but has now been extended. Lebanese leaders have condemned this military presence as an occupation, while the UN stresses the importance of adherence to the ceasefire terms to maintain regional stability.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced that Israeli forces would indefinitely remain in a so-called “buffer zone” in southern Lebanon, despite an earlier agreement that set a deadline for withdrawal. Katz stated that troops would hold five control positions, noting that their presence is conditioned on the situation rather than a set timeline. He indicated that the U.S. has supported this decision following discussions with Israeli officials.

This decision follows a ceasefire concluded on February 18, which ended a prolonged period of hostilities with Hezbollah, including significant ground troop deployment. Katz asserted control over the area, emphasizing its importance for Israel’s security. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar referred to these positions as “strategic high points,” asserting that they are essential until Lebanon fulfills its obligations under the ceasefire agreement.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, alongside other national leaders, condemned any Israeli military presence, labeling it as an occupation. The ceasefire, negotiated with the involvement of the United States and France, required Lebanon’s military to deploy alongside UN peacekeepers, facilitating Israel’s phased withdrawal over a specified period.

The United Nations has emphasized the importance of adhering to the agreed framework, noting concerns over potential delays in the troop withdrawal process. A joint statement issued by UN envoy Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert and UNIFIL underlined that any failure to comply with the resolution could breach the 2006 Security Council resolution that concluded a previous conflict between the two parties. Despite significant disruptions, the ceasefire has largely persisted amid ongoing violations.

Overall, the situation remains tense as hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah persist, primarily fueled by the latter’s involvement in regional conflicts, such as in Gaza. The prolonged conflict has notably weakened Hezbollah and disrupted its leadership structure, exerting long-term implications for regional stability.

In conclusion, Israeli forces will continue to occupy specific positions in southern Lebanon indefinitely, justified by security concerns. This stance has drawn criticism from Lebanese officials, calling it an occupation. The UNSC has made it clear that compliance with the ceasefire agreement is critical for maintaining peace. As instability continues, both the military presence and regional dynamics pose challenges for future diplomatic efforts.

Original Source: www.newarab.com