Iran’s Axis of Resistance Faces Collapse as Allies Weaken

The Iranian-led axis of resistance faces severe crises with the fall of Assad in Syria, challenges to Hezbollah and Hamas, and limited capabilities of its remaining affiliates. This marks a significant strategic loss for Iran in the Middle East’s geopolitical landscape.

The recent turmoil within Tehran’s alliance, termed the “axis of resistance,” has been monumental. This coalition, which includes vital regional allies like Syria, Hezbollah, and Hamas, has seen a dramatic collapse. Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad has reportedly fled amidst overwhelming rebel advances, while both Hezbollah and Hamas are embroiled in prolonged conflicts against Israel, diminishing their strength. Meanwhile, while Iran maintains affiliations with certain Iraqi and Yemeni militias, these factions serve only a peripheral role within the alliance. Experts believe that recovering from these losses will require considerable time and resources. Robert Ford, a recognized authority on the region, remarked that this situation represents a significant strategic loss for Iran, marking the weakening of its influence across the Middle East.

The “axis of resistance” is a coalition established by Iran over the past four decades, primarily aimed at countering U.S. and Israeli influence in the Middle East. This alliance comprises various militias and regimes across five countries, enabling Iran to extend its influence significantly from the Mediterranean to the Arabian Sea. As recent events unfold, the foundation of this alliance is facing unprecedented challenges, leading to a realignment of power within the region.

In summary, the current state of the “axis of resistance” signifies a profound shift in regional dynamics, characterized by the downfall of Assad and the weakening of Hezbollah and Hamas. The remaining Iranian affiliates appear unable to compensate for the losses incurred, suggesting that it may take years for Iran to re-establish its once formidable influence in the region.

Original Source: www.nytimes.com