Global news
AFP, AFRICA, BRITAIN, CEASEFIRE, CONFLICT, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, DAVID LAMMY, DMITRY POLYANSKIY, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE, LAM, LAMMY, MOHAMED HAMDAN DAGLO, NORTH AMERICA, RAPID SUPPORT FORCES, RSF, RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR, SECURITY COUNCIL, SIERRA LEONE, SUDAN, UN, UN SECURITY COUNCIL, UNITED NATIONS, UNITED STATES, US, WAR
Jamal Walker
0 Comments
Russia Vetoes UN Resolution for Ceasefire in Sudan Conflict
Russia vetoed a UN Security Council resolution on November 18, 2024, which aimed to establish an immediate ceasefire in Sudan amidst ongoing warfare between rival generals. British officials condemned the veto, emphasizing the detrimental impact on humanitarian efforts. The conflict has led to significant casualties and displacement, complicating the prospects for peace and stability in the region.
On November 18, 2024, Russia exercised its veto power at the United Nations Security Council, blocking a proposed resolution aimed at achieving an immediate ceasefire in Sudan, where conflict has persisted since April 2023 due to clashes between rival military factions. The draft resolution, prepared by Britain and Sierra Leone, urged both parties to cease hostilities and engage in national dialogue. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy condemned the veto as a “disgrace,” asserting that Russia’s actions undermined the council’s ability to present a unified stance. The ongoing civil strife in Sudan has led to significant humanitarian crises, with tens of thousands dead and millions displaced. This act of dissent is viewed within the broader context of geopolitical tensions between Russia and the United States, which continues to complicate the Security Council’s effectiveness in addressing global conflicts.
The civil conflict in Sudan, escalating since April 2023, pits the Sudanese Army under General Abdel Fattah Al Burhan against the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), led by General Mohamed Hamdan Daglo. Efforts to reach a peaceful resolution have been hindered not only by the hostilities but also by international politics. The UN Security Council, shaped by divisions among its permanent members, finds its resolutions often stymied, as exemplified by Russia’s recent veto against calls for peace in Sudan. Humanitarian concerns have mounted, with millions affected and accusations of severe human rights violations reported.
In summary, Russia’s veto of the UN resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Sudan highlights the complex interplay of international diplomacy and regional conflict. The British Foreign Secretary’s remarks reflect a growing frustration with Russia’s obstructionism, which hampers unified international efforts to address the dire humanitarian crisis in Sudan. The situation remains critical, demanding urgent and coordinated international attention to both alleviate suffering and foster dialogue among the conflicting parties.
Original Source: www.jordantimes.com
Post Comment