Mozambican Police Maintain Usage of Force Amid Protests Despite Calls for Dialogue

Mozambican police defend their crowd dispersal methods, claiming legitimacy despite evidence of violence. Civil society groups denounce repression, linking police actions to numerous deaths and injuries since protests began. Official calls for dialogue contrast sharply with ongoing police violence, signifying a critical dilemma in law enforcement conduct during public protests.

The Mozambican police have asserted that their methods for dispersing crowds during recent protests are legitimate, despite contrary evidence. Police spokesperson Leonel Muchina stated that while unforeseen situations may lead to injuries, the police are equipped to handle vandalism and disturbances through appropriate measures, such as tear gas.

Civil society organizations, including the Human Rights Commission of the Mozambican Bar Association, have accused the police of repression, murder, and torture against protesters opposing the election results from October. Reports indicate that since the protests began, police actions have resulted in 361 deaths and injuries to 619 individuals from gunfire.

In incidents such as the recent shooting in Matola, police have reportedly used live ammunition against demonstrators. Eyewitness accounts suggest that police fired on a group of youths engaged in a celebration, resulting in a death caused by a bullet to the head.

The use of live ammunition has faced criticism from government officials, including the Minister of Justice, Mateus Saize, who stated that the government advises using rubber bullets and tear gas instead. Joaquim Sive, the new police chief, emphasized the need for dialogue with protesters, urging officers to mediate rather than resort to force.

Despite these directives, reports suggest a disconnect as the Maputo city police continue to implement violent crowd-control methods. This disregard for the leadership’s call for moderation raises concerns about police conduct and accountability during civil unrest.

In summary, the Mozambican police maintain their actions against protesters are legitimate, though evidence and civil society organizations argue otherwise. Allegations of police violence, including the use of live ammunition, have led to significant casualties. While government leaders advocate for dialogue and non-violent measures, the persistent use of force by the police indicates a troubling stance on crowd control in the context of public demonstrations.

Original Source: clubofmozambique.com