Sudanese Refugees in Chad Face Crisis Amid U.S. Aid Reductions
Sudanese refugees in the Aboutengue Camp, primarily women and children, are facing severe hardships after U.S. foreign aid cuts. Organizations like HIAS have been unable to provide essential services due to reduced funding. Schools have also closed, threatening education for thousands. The Trump administration’s cuts to U.S. assistance have raised concerns about the impact on humanitarian support within the region.
Amidst the ongoing humanitarian crisis, Sudanese refugees residing in the Aboutengue Camp in Chad have expressed urgent needs for assistance following significant cuts to U.S. foreign aid introduced in January. Many of these refugees, primarily women and children, are struggling as crucial support services from organizations like HIAS have been suspended or significantly reduced.
Fatehiyya Mohamed Adam, a refugee who fled Sudan earlier this year, recently lost her possessions in an unfortunate fire at the camp. Although HIAS was ready to provide emergency assistance, the organization was impacted by the U.S. government’s drastic reductions in foreign aid. Despite the suspension of HIAS’s work being lifted in March, uncertainty remains regarding the availability of funding for vital programs.
One anonymous woman shared her gratitude for the support she received from HIAS, especially in the aftermath of a domestic violence incident. However, the N.G.O. has had to pause salary payments for its workers and counseling sessions for victims of gender-based violence, leaving many vulnerable individuals without necessary resources.
The closure of schools, such as those operated by Jesuit Refugee Services, has also had a profound impact. Previously, these institutions served over 32,000 students, like Kawsar Mahamat Yakub, but are now struggling to remain operational. Although some teachers have returned to volunteer, a significant decrease in student enrollment has raised concerns about the schools’ futures.
The reduced funding is a result of the Trump administration’s decision to cut 83 percent of U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) programs and 40 percent of State Department grants. The administration has argued that such programs are wasteful and not aligned with U.S. interests, leading to cuts amounting to billions of dollars in global assistance.
The dire situation faced by Sudanese refugees in Chad underscores the critical role of foreign aid in supporting vulnerable populations. With significant cuts to U.S. assistance, organizations like HIAS have struggled to provide essential services, leaving refugees at risk. Moreover, the closure of educational facilities exacerbates the crisis, highlighting the urgent need for renewed aid and support initiatives to address these humanitarian challenges effectively.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
Post Comment