Trump Administration Considers Expansive Travel Ban Targeting 43 Countries

The Trump administration is proposing a travel ban affecting citizens from 43 countries, including a complete ban on 11 nations such as Afghanistan and Venezuela. A separate list will impose restrictions on 10 countries, allowing some exceptions for business travelers. Ongoing diplomatic evaluations aim to finalize the list in light of national security concerns.

The Trump administration is contemplating a new travel ban targeting citizens from up to 43 countries, surpassing the restrictions put in place during his initial term. A draft list created by diplomatic and security officials identifies an absolute ban on citizens from 11 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, and Venezuela, among others, due to perceived deficiencies in vetting practices.

Additionally, an “orange” list comprising 10 countries would face travel restrictions but would still allow affluent business travelers. This list includes Belarus, Myanmar, and Russia. The State Department has been tasked with finalizing the list based on national security assessments, with input from various government agencies.

President Trump previously mandated the identification of countries with inadequate vetting and screening mechanisms for their nationals. As the completion of review processes approaches, uncertainty remains regarding existing visa holders and green card holders in relation to the proposed travel bans.

The consideration of nations such as Bhutan raises questions about their inclusion, as does the potential impact on foreign policy related to Russia and Venezuela. A separate “yellow” list, consisting of 22 countries, will be monitored for compliance, potentially facing inclusion in other more restrictive categories if concerns are not addressed.

The impending travel ban proposal from the Trump administration aims to encompass 43 countries, with stark distinctions between those barred outright and those subject to restricted travel. The initiative highlights ongoing national security concerns and reflects complex geopolitical considerations. As deliberations continue, the implications for existing visa holders and foreign relations remain pivotal aspects of the discourse surrounding this potential policy shift.

Original Source: risingnepaldaily.com