New Travel Ban Proposal Targets Citizens of 43 Countries

The Trump administration is drafting a new travel ban targeting citizens from up to 43 countries, proposing a “red” list of 11 countries barred from entry and an “orange” list of 10 with restrictions. The draft is under review by officials and experts, with potential changes expected as discussions continue.

The Trump administration is contemplating a comprehensive travel ban affecting the citizens of up to 43 countries, potentially expanding beyond the restrictions enforced during his initial term. A draft list, generated by diplomatic and security officials, outlines three tiers of countries designated for these restrictions.

The most severe restrictions are indicated in the “red” list, which includes 11 nations whose citizens would be entirely barred from entering the United States: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. These recommendations have circulated within the administration, although adjustments are anticipated prior to reaching the White House.

Officials across various departments have been scrutinizing the draft, addressing whether the assessments of specific countries’ deficiencies are valid, and considering policy implications that could influence the final list. Additionally, the proposal includes an “orange” list, comprising 10 countries where travel is restricted yet not entirely prohibited. Affluent business travelers may still gain entry, while those seeking immigrant or tourist visas would face limitations.

The proposed travel ban draft suggests a systematic approach to restricting entry into the United States for citizens from 43 countries, analyzing security concerns and diplomatic relations. The differentiation into tiers, particularly the total prohibition for the “red” list countries, reflects heightened security scrutiny. Ongoing discussions within various government departments indicate that the draft is subject to change before any final decisions are made.

Original Source: www.nytimes.com