Hezbollah Responds to Potential Lebanon-Israel Normalization Discussions

Hezbollah is expressing fears over potential normalization between Lebanon and Israel, with political sources emphasizing that discussions are unacceptable. Lebanon broadly denies any intent to normalize relations and maintains a stance against Israeli presence. Political figures assert that normalization cannot be imposed, reflecting a contentious balance of power in the region.

Recent reports indicate that Hezbollah is increasingly apprehensive about discussions surrounding potential normalization between Lebanon and Israel. Political sources disclosed to the pro-Hezbollah publication, Al-Diyar, that both the presidential office and the Lebanese government have communicated that any negotiations towards normalization with Israel are seen as completely unacceptable. This sentiment stems mainly from Israel’s military presence at five locations in southern Lebanon and alleged violations pertaining to the existing ceasefire agreement.

Despite Lebanon’s official position denying that indirect negotiations are aimed at leading towards normalization, discussions are centered on border disputes, specifically avoiding the territorial complexities of the Mount Dov area. However, the publicization of such negotiations has caused unease among Hezbollah and its Shiite ally, the Amal Movement.

Lebanese officials have asserted, “Lebanon’s position is decisive and enjoys a broad consensus; normalization cannot be forced upon Lebanon.” They have also recognized a shift in the balance of power that currently seems to favor Israel, yet noted the potential for change, emphasizing that the pro-Iranian bloc, including Hezbollah, still retains several advantageous cards.

The Lebanese sources further elaborated that “despite ongoing efforts, the US administration fully understands that Lebanon cannot pursue normalization,” and reiterated Lebanon’s commitment to align with a unified Arab position, particularly that of Saudi Arabia, which ties any normalization discussions to the establishment of a two-state solution that Israel presently rejects.

In light of these developments, Hezbollah member Ali Fayyad made a strong declaration stating, “Lebanon has not accepted and will not accept normalization with the Israelis. Israel is an enemy that contradicts Lebanon’s existence, identity, and interests.” He emphasized the significance of the resistance movement as a representation of the populace, warning relevant parties against overlooking public sentiment.

In conclusion, Hezbollah’s leadership expresses significant concerns over normalization talks between Lebanon and Israel, reiterating Lebanon’s official stance against such movements. Despite the current balance of power appearing to favor Israel, Lebanese officials assert their commitment to resistance and adherence to Arab consensus. As internal and external pressures mount, the future dynamics within Lebanon hinge on the ongoing political discourse and regional stability efforts.

Original Source: www.israelhayom.com