CPDM at 40: Celebration or Four Decades of Stagnation and Repression?

The Cameroon People’s Democratic Movement (CPDM) marks 40 years in power on March 24. While some celebrate this endurance, many criticize it as a reminder of stagnation and repression under President Paul Biya. As the country prepares for the elections, concerns about governance, youth unemployment, and ongoing crises persist, with questions about Biya’s imminent re-election and the future direction of the nation.

On March 24, the ruling Cameroon People’s Democratic Movement (CPDM) will commemorate its 40th anniversary in power. This milestone evokes mixed sentiments; while some regard it as a testament to endurance, others criticize it as a reminder of stagnation, repression, and unfulfilled promises. Founded in 1985 by President Paul Biya, who has ruled since 1982, the CPDM has faced numerous challenges yet maintained Biya’s tight grip on power.

Despite economic collapse, international scrutiny, and ongoing separatist violence, CPDM Secretary-General Jean Nkuete expressed confidence in Biya’s leadership, claiming he is “the only man wise enough” to advance Cameroon. This statement appears to confirm expectations that Biya will seek re-election, emphasizing his reluctance to relinquish his role.

As the CPDM plans festivities, many citizens question the rationale behind the celebrations. Youth unemployment remains disproportionately high at over 30%, compelling graduates to seek survival through informal work. Furthermore, persistent power outages hinder business operations, while the unresolved Anglophone crisis has led to significant displacement and loss of life since its inception in 2017.

The upcoming elections echo familiar patterns of predetermined outcomes, with the electoral commission and security apparatus tightly controlled by the CPDM. Critics, including Maurice Kamto of the Cameroon Renaissance Movement, allege that the ruling party orchestrates elections with results preordained, and some citizens humorously suggest that announcing Biya as the winner in advance would be a cost-effective approach.

The CPDM touts several “successes” attributed to Biya’s administration, such as reliance on presidential decrees over legislative governance and systematic election manipulation. Their approach has seemingly transformed the youth from ambitious individuals into economic migrants, eager to escape the prevailing hardships in Cameroon.

Though the CPDM heralds its 40 years of governance as progress, a significant portion of the populace questions whether the celebration is for the party’s endurance or the nation’s gradual decline. As the October elections draw closer, Biya’s re-election seems inevitable, culminating in a lingering question—will he reach a 50-year tenure, or will natural succession occur before that?

In summary, as the CPDM approaches its 40th anniversary, opinions remain divided on its legacy. While some celebrate its longevity, others lament the stagnation and repression experienced under Biya’s regime. With pressing issues such as unemployment, infrastructural neglect, and ongoing crises, the populace questions whether the forthcoming electoral process will yield genuine political change or simply uphold the status quo. Amidst these challenges, there remains uncertainty regarding Biya’s future, as he positions himself for another potential term in office.

Original Source: www.cameroon-concord.com