Trump at CPAC 2025: A Unified Conservative Stance Against Climate Protections

The 2025 CPAC emphasized a unified conservative stance against climate policy, featuring speeches from Donald Trump, Liz Truss, and others that advocated for fossil fuel deregulation. Trump criticized the Paris Agreement and the Green New Deal, while leaders pushed for the abolition of regulations. The conference lacked scientific discussion on climate issues, focusing instead on ideological opposition and promoting a vision of energy independence.

The 2025 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) took place near Washington, D.C. amid significant emphasis on climate policy denial, with key speakers including former President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Elon Musk. They collectively promoted a deregulation agenda concerning fossil fuels, reflecting a united front against climate protections, which can be seen in Trump’s outspoken criticism of the Paris Agreement and the Green New Deal.

During his address, Trump rejected the legitimacy of the Green New Deal, characterized it as a hoax, and falsely referenced a supposed electric vehicle mandate by President Biden. He claimed that individuals should have the freedom to choose any vehicle type, except hydrogen cars, making a baseless assertion regarding hydrogen fuel safety. His speech highlighted a shift in CPAC’s handling of environmental dialogues, moving away from science-centered discussions to purely ideological opposition.

Former Prime Minister of the UK, Liz Truss, expressed discontent over the reinstatement of a ban on fracking that she had initially aimed to lift, attributing high energy prices in Britain to net-zero policies. Truss echoed sentiments of dismantling the “deep state” and proposed a comprehensive repeal of numerous laws, demonstrating a need for radical political change in Britain.

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright echoed Trump’s mantras by promising aggressive efforts to abolish regulations imposed under the Biden administration, particularly concerning fossil fuel regulations. He emphasized a focus on expanding energy production amid concerns over economic competition, especially with China and the burgeoning AI sector.

Moreover, Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy expressed ambitions for future political roles while promoting energy projects that primarily focus on exporting resources to international markets. His address at CPAC illustrated Trump’s vision for Alaska as a pivotal solution to energy dilemmas facing the U.S.

Doug Burgum, the Secretary of the Interior, discussed exploiting public lands for energy purposes, touting it as a pathway to economic benefit and potential political accolades, including a Nobel Prize. The establishment of the National Energy Dominance Council underlines the administration’s commitment to removing regulatory barriers.

Within the conference, CFACT emerged as the singular organization addressing climate issues, with its officials downplaying the consensus on climate change. They voiced concerns over the ideological dominance of leftist views on college campuses, asserting the necessity for conservative perspectives in academic discussions on environmental policy.

This CPAC event underscored the conservative movement’s collective commitment to fossil fuel promotion and climate skepticism, marking a departure from previous years that integrated scientific discourse into such gatherings. The pervasive anti-climate sentiment reflects a broader political strategy centered on deregulation and energy independence, positioning the movement as a formidable opponent to current environmental policies.

In essence, the 2025 CPAC highlighted a concerted effort by conservative leaders to promote climate skepticism while advocating for fossil fuel deregulation. From Trump’s disparagement of the Paris Agreement and the Green New Deal to Truss’s critique of net-zero policies, the conference showcased a unified stance against climate protections. Furthermore, the lack of scientific discourse marked a significant shift in the thematic structure of CPAC, emphasizing ideological unity over empirical discussion. The developments at CPAC point toward an intensified focus on energy independence and fossil fuel reliance among U.S. conservatives, raising critical questions about the future of environmental policy.

Original Source: whowhatwhy.org