China’s Diplomatic Role: Aligning Rhetoric with Global Responsibility

China’s aspirations as a global power require it to align its diplomatic actions with its stated principles. Despite claims of advocating for dialogue in international conflicts like Ukraine, Beijing’s support for Russia and assertiveness towards neighbors contradicts these claims. Additionally, China’s military expansion raises concerns. To achieve global respect, China must reconcile its rhetoric with actual conduct.

China’s role in global diplomacy necessitates alignment with its aspirations as a prominent power. Amid concerns over the historical behavior of the United States in international politics, the focus has shifted to how China will conduct its foreign policy as the world’s second-largest economy. It is crucial that all nations adhere to global rules without applying double standards, thus ensuring equitable international relations among great powers and smaller nations alike.

During the recent National People’s Congress, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi articulated key principles of Chinese diplomacy, emphasizing the nation’s responsibilities as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council. Nevertheless, there appears to be a significant disconnect between these stated principles and China’s actual diplomatic engagements, particularly in relation to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

While Wang claimed that China advocated for a dialogue-centered resolution to the Ukraine crisis immediately following Russia’s invasion in 2022, there is little evidence of substantive efforts by Beijing to foster a cease-fire. Instead, China’s deepening economic ties with Russia, evidenced by increased oil imports, suggest strong support for Moscow’s actions throughout the conflict.

The recent activities of the United States in the U.N. Security Council, which included a resolution urging a swift resolution to the Ukraine-Russia situation without holding Moscow accountable, further complicate China’s diplomatic stance. China’s vote in favor of this resolution, alongside its criticism of U.S. policies and the simultaneous alignment with Russia, highlights significant contradictions within its diplomatic narrative.

Additionally, China’s assertive foreign policy towards neighboring countries remains evident. In disputes with the Philippines over South China Sea territories, China has intensified military presence through the deployment of large patrol vessels and aircraft. A similar aggressive posturing is observed in its incursions surrounding the Senkaku Islands, which are claimed by Japan.

As for the ban on Japanese seafood imports tied to the Fukushima water release, there has been a lack of action from China to ease these restrictions, despite previous commitments. Wang’s responses on this matter have remained general and non-committal, indicating a persistent reluctance in resolving the issue.

Moreover, China’s military budget, which increased by 7.2 percent, has raised international apprehensions due to its opaqueness. With reports of an impending commissioning of a third aircraft carrier and an accelerated nuclear buildup, there are growing concerns regarding China’s military ambitions that extend beyond mere defense.

If China wishes to establish itself as a responsible global power, it is imperative that it harmonizes its diplomatic rhetoric with actionable commitments that reflect genuine efforts towards international cooperation and conflict resolution.

In conclusion, while China articulates commitments to international diplomacy that espouse equality and responsibility, its actions reveal a stark contrast. As it continues to navigate complex international relationships, particularly with Russia and its neighbors, a sincere alignment between its diplomatic principles and real-world conduct is essential. Without this alignment, China’s aspirations of global responsibility may be hindered, necessitating a reevaluation of its foreign policy strategies to promote transparency and cooperation on global issues.

Original Source: www.asahi.com