Arab Leaders Endorse Egypt’s Reconstruction Plan for Gaza Against U.S. Proposal

Arab leaders have supported Egypt’s reconstruction plan for Gaza, opposing U.S. President Trump’s proposal to relocate its Palestinian population. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi emphasized the necessity of a solution that preserves Palestinian rights. However, U.S. and Israeli officials criticize the plan, highlighting the current humanitarian crisis and maintaining their stance on Hamas. Egypt’s detailed plan targets a 2030 reconstruction timeline with significant humanitarian investment and infrastructure development.

On Tuesday, Arab leaders endorsed Egypt’s plan for the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, which aims to allow the existing 2 million Palestinians to remain in their homeland. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi expressed gratitude for the unified support among Arab nations, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive solution that upholds Palestinian rights and aims to resolve the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In response to the Egyptian proposition, White House National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes dismissed it as impractical, noting the severe humanitarian condition within Gaza and reaffirming President Trump’s commitment to a vision of rebuilding the area devoid of Hamas influence. Hughes anticipated further discussions on achieving regional peace and prosperity under this framework.

Oren Marmorstein, a spokesperson for the Israeli foreign ministry, criticized the Egyptian initiative for failing to adhere to the current reality in Gaza. He highlighted the absence of mention regarding the Hamas attacks that instigated the conflict, stating that the proposal depends on outdated views. Marmorstein assured support for Trump’s alternative plan, which suggests relocating Gaza’s current population.

Egypt’s Foreign Minister, Badr Abdelatty, vigorously rejected Israeli assertions, labeling them unacceptable and calling for a recognized Palestinian state per international law. He contended that ongoing conflict would persist if Israel continued to impose its will, advocating for an accountable approach to ensure peace.

From Hamas’ perspective, the outcomes of the summit signified welcomed support from Arab leaders rejecting any plans to displace Palestinians. Israel, however, has embraced an alternate proposal concerning a ceasefire and hostage negotiations while continuing to restrict aid to Gaza, drawing significant criticism from human rights advocates.

Egypt’s reconstruction strategy entails a timeline leading to the revitalization of Gaza by 2030, focusing on the removal of rubble and ordnance as a primary step. The initiative encompasses an international conference in collaboration with the UN for funding, a trust fund overseen by the World Bank, and sustainable developments such as new housing, renewable energy, and infrastructure improvements.

The plan also suggests establishing an interim administration in Gaza while Hamas is expected to cede power, contingent that the Palestinian Authority would eventually manage the region. This step is contentious, as Israel denies any role for the Palestinian Authority, further complicating the pathway to establishing a viable Palestinian state.

The recent conflict initiated on October 7, 2023, resulted in substantial casualties on both sides, with various humanitarian challenges ensuing for the Gazan populace. While Israel maintains its stance regarding security control over the territories, the repercussions of the ongoing war continue to alarm global observers, necessitating urgent international attention toward a lasting resolution.

In conclusion, the endorsement of Egypt’s reconstruction plan by Arab leaders marks a significant counter to U.S. President Trump’s proposal for Gaza. While Egypt aims to retain the Palestinian population within Gaza, opposition from Israel and the U.S. indicates a challenging path ahead. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza remains critical, underscoring the need for effective international efforts to foster a peaceful resolution and support the reconstruction of the area. The situation continues to evolve, requiring vigilance and concerted diplomatic engagement.

Original Source: www.washingtonpost.com