Russia Condemns Military Threats Against Iran’s Nuclear Facilities

Russia condemned military threats against Iran’s nuclear sites, warning of catastrophic consequences. Ulyanov stated Iran is the most verified IAEA member, contrasting with critics advocating nuclear programs. Calls for diplomatic engagement continue amidst Western sanctions and the challenge of returning to the JCPOA. Ulyanov urged nations to abandon aggressive postures in favor of constructive dialogue for nuclear compliance.

Russia has vocally opposed threats to use military force against Iran’s nuclear establishments, emphasizing that such actions would lead to dire consequences. During a session of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors, Russia’s Permanent Representative, Mikhail Ulyanov, stated, “Endless claims against Iran are unacceptable,” stressing the potential ramifications of military escalations. Ulyanov warned that threats from the United States and its allies, based on unfounded allegations regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions, risk extinguishing any diplomatic channels for resolution and could trigger severe humanitarian crises beyond just Iran.

Ulyanov underscored that Iran is the most scrutinized member state of the IAEA, distinct from non-nuclear nations that have criticized it. He pointed out that the IAEA has allocated over 10 million euros annually for verifying Iran’s compliance under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), indicating the rigorous inspection regime in place. He referred to the IAEA Director General’s report to support his claims and reaffirm the importance of Iran in nuclear non-proliferation discussions.

On the same day, Elbridge Colby, the nominated US Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, talked about the importance of maintaining credible military options to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, contradicting Iran’s position derived from its religious framework against such weapons, articulated by Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei. The Israeli regime has also acted on its threats against Iran, recently conducting military strikes purportedly targeting Iranian nuclear research sites, which Iran claims have not caused significant damage.

Ulyanov called for diplomatic efforts to take precedence, with critical negotiations required given the approaching “Completion Day” of the JCPOA. He noted, “The diplomatic resource remains, but political will is needed to use it,” while highlighting the potential constructive role of the IAEA Director General in mediating the discussions. He lamented the U.S. exit from the deal in 2018 and the ensuing sanctions that have exacerbated tensions.

The European powers—UK, France, and Germany—have attempted to re-engage the U.S. in the JCPOA yet have also reimposed their sanctions against Iran, abandoning their commitments. Ulyanov advised these nations to move away from the unrealistic notion of activating the “snapback” mechanism for reinstating UN sanctions, citing past legal decisions that challenge their capability to do so due to prior violations. He urged these countries to find a constructive solution rather than continue a confrontational stance.

The envoy noted that Iran exhibited considerable restraint in the wake of the U.S. maximum pressure campaign, adhering to its JCPOA commitments until February 2021. He emphasized that the activation of snapback sanctions would be irresponsible and unlawful as it disregards the established agreements. Iran remains open to returning to full compliance if reciprocated by Western nations, though ongoing Western reluctance hinders this possibility.

In summary, Russia’s strong opposition to military threats against Iran’s nuclear facilities highlights the dire consequences such actions could entail. The insistence on diplomatic engagement remains crucial, particularly considering the complexities surrounding the JCPOA and the actions of Western nations. Ulyanov’s remarks underscore the need for a collective, constructive approach to prevent escalation and foster compliance with international agreements. The ongoing tension underscores the precarious balance in efforts towards non-proliferation and regional stability.

Original Source: www.presstv.ir