Examining the Proposal for Gaza’s Relocation to Sinai

Approximately 2.2 million residents in Gaza face overcrowded conditions and limited employment, compared to Sinai’s larger area and lower density. The cultural ties between the populations suggest a possible relocation of Gazans to Sinai could enhance economic conditions. For this, Egypt must open its borders, allowing voluntary migration while addressing the broader U.S.-Egypt-Israel relations.

The Gaza Strip currently houses around 2.2 million residents in a densely populated 360 square kilometers, lacking sufficient employment options and industrial development. In contrast, the Sinai Peninsula adjacent to Gaza spans 60,000 square kilometers, with about 600,000 inhabitants, highlighting a stark difference in population density—Gaza is approximately 600 times more densely populated than Sinai.

Gaza and Sinai share cultural and ethnic similarities, with common language, religious beliefs, and even familial connections, particularly evident in Rafah, a city divided by the border. Sinai sees minimal agricultural or solar energy initiatives and mainly serves as a conduit for smuggling operations, underscoring its untapped potential.

Integrating a million people from Gaza into Sinai could foster economic growth and enhance living conditions. Liberty of movement is essential for this strategy, and the potential voluntary relocation of Gazans is hardly objectionable, especially when considering the international acceptance of refugees from other conflict zones.

For the plan to unfold, Egypt must acknowledge its border responsibilities. If Egypt were to open the Rafah crossing, it is estimated that around 80% of Gaza’s population could relocate voluntarily. However, Egypt’s reliance on foreign assistance, particularly from the United States and Israel, complicates its proactive involvement.

The current relationship dynamics necessitate a reevaluation, as Egypt appears to maintain the Gaza issue rather than seek its resolution. Concerns arise from the Egyptian government’s close coordination with Hamas, particularly regarding mediation efforts while conducting military operations targeted against Israel.

A comprehensive review of U.S.-Egypt and Israel-Egypt relations is paramount, especially to instigate a shift in Egypt’s operational role in governing Gaza. Historically, Egypt’s administration of Gaza under an Arab League mandate prior to 1967 offers a potential framework for establishing stability within the region.

President Trump’s initiative has the potential to address core regional issues by transitioning Gaza’s management back to Egypt, fostering economic prospects for its inhabitants, and decreasing violence. A concerted effort from both the U.S. and Israel is essential to persuade Egypt to engage actively in this strategic plan for the betterment of the region.

In summary, the relocation of a substantial number of Gazans to Sinai presents a viable solution to ongoing challenges in the Gaza Strip. The need for Egypt to open its borders and the international community’s support are crucial for the success of this initiative. By leveraging historical connections and addressing the economic landscape, this proposal could lead to a significant improvement in regional stability and prosperity. Ultimately, revisiting and redefining the relationships between the United States, Israel, and Egypt is necessary to facilitate a new approach towards Gaza, aiming for peace and development.

Original Source: www.jpost.com