Sudan’s RSF and Allies Form Rival Government Amid Ongoing Conflict

Sudan’s RSF has signed a charter to establish a rival government alongside allies in response to ongoing conflict with the national army. The agreement seeks to create a “government of peace and unity” but faces criticism over potential national fragmentation. With significant international ramifications, the situation underscores the urgent need for humanitarian aid and continued negotiations.

Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have formally announced the establishment of a rival government alongside their allies, despite warnings about potential fragmentation of the nation. Spokesman Najm al-Din Drisa confirmed the signing of the charter in Nairobi, asserting it aims to create a “government of peace and unity” in regions controlled by rebel factions.
This agreement comes nearly two years into a devastating conflict that has displaced over 12 million people and led to significant humanitarian crises, according to the United Nations. Among the agreement signatories is a faction of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N), led by Abdelaziz al-Hilu, controlling portions of South Kordofan and Blue Nile states. Abdel Rahim Daglo, a senior RSF official, also signed the charter, which emphasizes secularism and a unified national army.
The charter’s outlined goals include the end of hostilities, unimpeded humanitarian aid, and the integration of armed groups into a national force. However, the conflict, sparked by disputes regarding RSF integration into the regular military, has claimed tens of thousands of lives, drawing international attention with accusations of genocide against the RSF in Darfur.
As the government aligned with the traditional army prepares to reclaim territory, including potentially Khartoum, earlier announcements denoting the parallel government’s legitimacy face scrutiny. Ali Youssef, the foreign minister of the army-backed government, insisted on not recognizing any parallel authority, and warnings have arisen about the potential increased fragmentation of Sudan following this announcement.
Analysts suggest that these actions are an attempt to bolster the RSF amid military challenges, aiming to gain recognition as a governing body rather than a militia. The implications of such developments remain concerning, given that any arms sales would violate existing embargoes.
The recent signing ceremony in Kenya has drawn backlash from Sudan’s military government, prompting the recall of its ambassador in response to perceptions of Kenyan President William Ruto’s entanglement with the RSF and its backers.

In summary, the RSF’s formation of a rival government marks a significant development amidst ongoing conflict in Sudan, raising concerns about further fragmentation of the nation. Despite plans for peace and unity, the political and military tensions continue to pose challenges to any resolution, while international observers remain wary of the implications for humanitarian efforts and regional stability. The situation underscores the complexity of Sudan’s political landscape and highlights the need for continued diplomatic engagement.

Original Source: www.france24.com