Technology
AMAPA, AMAPÁ, AMAZON, AMAZON RIVER, BAHIA, BRAZIL, CABO DE SANTO AGOSTINNHO, CNS, COMBONI, COMBONI MISSIONARIES, COMMISSION FOR MINING AND INTEGRAL ECOLOGY, DIEGO NIGRO, DIOCESE OF LIVRAMENTO DE NOSSA SENHORA, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, LEAH ROSE CASIMERO, LIVRAMENTO DE NOSSA SENHORA, LULA, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE BISHOPS OF BRAZIL, PATIACHI TAYLOR, REUTERS, SOUTH AMERICA, SPECIAL COMMISSION FOR MINING AND INTEGRAL ECOLOGY, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, SYNOD OF BISHOPS, SYNOD OF BISHOPS FOR THE AMAZON, THE AMAZON, TRADE RELATIONS, VATICAN, VICENTE DE PAULA FERREIRA
Jamal Walker
0 Comments
Coalition of Bishops and Scientists Opposes Brazilian Oil Exploration Plans
A coalition of 100 scientists, activists, and 21 bishops publicly condemned Brazil’s plans for oil exploration near the Amazon River, warning of severe ecological risks. They call for a reduction in fossil fuel production and consumption. The group highlights the need for sustainable practices and public dialogue, especially with the COP30 climate conference approaching.
In a united front against impending oil exploration in Brazil, a coalition comprising 100 scientists, environmentalists, social activists, and 21 bishops released a public letter on February 18. This coalition condemned the Lula administration’s plans for oil exploration near the Amazon River’s mouth, labeling it as “ecological suicide” and calling for an urgent reduction in fossil fuel consumption. The signatories warned that such exploration poses significant risks to local ecosystems and perpetuates an economic model that exacerbates greenhouse gas emissions.
Among the bishops, Bishop Vicente de Paula Ferreira highlighted concerns regarding the government’s capitalistic approach, stating, “The government’s rhetoric is based on a capitalistic mindset of unlimited profits. But the planet doesn’t have resources for unlimited growth anymore. We have to protect what’s left.” Fr. Dario Bossi, part of the bishops’ commission, emphasized the diverse support for this cause, illustrating that opposition to the government’s project comes from various sectors, not just social activists.
The ambition to extract oil from Brazil’s Equatorial Margin has resurfaced since 2014, primarily driven by Petrobras’ applications for exploration licenses. Although President Lula had campaigned on restoring environmental protections, tensions arose when he and Minister of Environment Marina Silva opposed each other on the issue, with Ibama categorizing Petrobras’ proposal as high-risk.
Luiz Marques, a history professor and letter organizer, detailed the region’s ecological value, pointing to its rich biological diversity, including significant phytoplankton and mangrove ecosystems. He noted the potential for oil spills to spread rapidly and harm extensive marine life. While Petrobras claims to have met all licensing requirements, Ibama has yet to approve the project due to concerns about environmental impacts.
Despite Lula’s arguments that oil revenues would support Brazil’s poorest citizens and fund energy transition, critics maintain that such plans are misguided, arguing returns do not significantly support public welfare. Bishop Ferreira observed that historically, resource extraction leaves communities devastated, stating, “It’s a great mistake. We know there’s nothing left for the people after oil drilling and mining devastate their territories.”
In anticipation of the 2025 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30), the bishops’ commission, alongside other organizations, is mobilizing public awareness about Brazil’s environmental crises. Ferreira pointed out the contradiction in Brazil pursuing oil exploration while hosting COP30. Both Bossi and Marques are skeptical about substantive outcomes at COP30, stressing the need for genuine discussion regarding ecological issues while advocating for alternatives to oil-dominated economic models.
Bossi argued that Brazil could support local economies focused on sustainable practices rather than extensive oil exploration, positing the formation of mining-free and oil-free zones in the Amazon as crucial for biodiversity preservation. This vision includes bolstering local production of nuts and other sustainable products to foster food sovereignty. The imperative for informed public discourse on these critical issues remains urgent as the environmental stakes continue to rise.
The coalition of scientists, activists, and bishops has clearly articulated their opposition to oil exploration in Brazil, emphasizing the grave ecological risks involved. As significant voices in this movement, their collective message calls for a reevaluation of current policies and urgent commitments to sustainable practices. The role of public engagement and awareness is paramount as Brazil faces critical environmental challenges and prepares to host the upcoming COP30.
Original Source: www.ncronline.org
Post Comment