Mozambique’s Constitutional Court Confirms Frelimo’s Controversial Election Victory

Mozambique’s Constitutional Council confirmed Frelimo’s election victory for Daniel Chapo with 65% of the vote, amid allegations of electoral fraud and significant opposition protests since October. At least 130 people died in clashes, and claims of rigging have been disputed by Frelimo. Opposition leader Venancio Mondlane warned of future unrest following the ruling.

On Monday, Mozambique’s Constitutional Council affirmed the results of the contentious presidential election, thereby ensuring the ruling Frelimo party retains its power for an unprecedented 50 years. The Court’s seven judges determined that Frelimo’s candidate, Daniel Chapo, received 65% of the votes, a downward adjustment from the initial nearly 71%. Frelimo has had authority over Mozambique since its independence in 1975. Despite this ruling, opposition groups have alleged electoral manipulation, resulting in widespread protests and civil unrest throughout the nation.

The political landscape in Mozambique has been dominated by the Frelimo party since it became independent from Portuguese rule in 1975. Over the years, Frelimo has faced allegations of electoral fraud, particularly during recent elections. The October 2024 presidential election saw claims of rigged results, which led to significant public protests. The unrest has been marked by violence, with reports indicating at least 130 fatalities. Western observers have found the electoral process lacking in fairness and transparency, further complicating Mozambique’s political climate.

In summary, the Constitutional Council’s confirmation of the election results has sparked continued tension in Mozambique, as opposition figures maintain that the election was unjustly manipulated. The protests and violence that have ensued reflect deep political divisions in the country, as citizens grapple with rising discontent against the ruling party’s longstanding rule. The implications of this decision on Mozambique’s democratic processes remain to be seen, particularly with calls for potential uprisings by opposition leaders.

Original Source: www.dw.com