Suriname Issues Protest Note to Guyana Over Disputed Tigri Area Developments

Suriname’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Albert Ramdin, delivered a protest note to Guyana over planned developments in the disputed Tigri area. The note addressed the Guyanese administration’s intentions concerning an airstrip and other developments without Surinamese permission, highlighting concerns about the potential disruption of bilateral relations.

On Friday, Suriname’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Business, and International Cooperation, Albert Ramdin, voiced his concerns by delivering a formal protest note to the Guyanese government. This action was prompted by reports indicating the Guyanese administration’s intention to develop the contested border region, specifically the airstrip at Camp Jaguar in the Tigri area, which both nations claim. Ramdin summoned the Guyanese ambassador to discuss President Irfaan Ali’s plans to commence airstrip pavement work in the Upper Corantijn area before year-end, as well as the proposed establishment of a new school on Kasjoe Island within the disputed territory.

During their meeting, Ramdin conveyed concerns regarding statements from President Ali that implied work within Surinamese territory could proceed without due authorization. Furthermore, he referenced prior agreements made in 1970 between the two nations, which stipulated acceptable conduct regarding territorial presence. Ramdin stressed that these public announcements could jeopardize the ongoing collaborative efforts between Suriname and Guyana. The historical context of the Tigri Area, previously seized by the Guyana Defence Force in 1969, remains a contentious point in negotiations. In the past, leaders from both nations have expressed their commitment to a peaceful resolution, but tensions surrounding the issue persist.

The territorial dispute between Suriname and Guyana over the Tigri area, also known as the New River Triangle, has a long and complex history rooted in colonial legacies. Following a brief conflict in 1969, both nations engaged in discussions mediated by Trinidad and Tobago. The 1970 agreement called for military withdrawals, yet Guyana has failed to honor this commitment, maintaining control over the area. Previous administrations have acknowledged the importance of resolving the dispute amicably, reaffirming their claims while recognizing the need for constructive dialogue to enhance bilateral relations.

In summary, the tension over the disputed Tigri area underscores ongoing challenges in Surinamese-Guyanese relations. Suriname’s protest against Guyana’s plans for developments in this contested territory reflects a deeper historical and political issue that has persisted for decades. Both nations have expressed a desire for peaceful resolution, yet current actions may threaten to disrupt the friendly cooperation that has been cultivated in recent years.

Original Source: www.guardian.co.tt