Sudan’s RSF Enforces Ban on Exports to Egypt Amid Rising Tensions

The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan, led by Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, have imposed a ban on Sudanese exports to Egypt, citing Cairo’s interference in Sudan’s affairs and accusations of air raids against RSF positions. This ban, effective in regions controlled by the RSF, presents a significant diplomatic shift and potential escalation of tensions between the two nations. Merchant compliance is mandated under threat of punishment, raising concerns over the economic repercussions and the nature of future relations.

The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan, under the leadership of Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, commonly referred to as Hemedti, have declared a prohibition on Sudanese exports to Egypt. This decision was announced on Saturday and is purportedly in retaliation for Egypt’s alleged interference in Sudan’s internal matters. Hemedti has recently accused Egypt of conducting air strikes against RSF positions; however, the Egyptian Foreign Ministry strongly refuted these allegations. This export ban will be enforced in regions of Sudan currently under RSF control, marking a pivotal shift in the diplomatic ties between Sudan and Egypt. Notably, a prominent RSF representative in the Blue Nile region, Abu Shoutal, issued a stern warning to merchants, cautioning them against exporting goods to Egypt and threatening repercussions for those who contravene the ban. He asserted, “Any truck headed to Egypt through the al-Dabba crossing should be dealt with as an enemy.” The range of Sudanese goods typically exported to Egypt includes agricultural products and livestock, such as peanuts, corn, sesame, gum Arabic, camels, and cattle, predominantly sourced from regions managed by the RSF, including Darfur and Kordofan. Given that the RSF governs areas bordering Egypt, this ban is anticipated to significantly hinder Sudan’s export capabilities to its northern neighbor. Journalist and civil rights advocate Rasha Awad conveyed to Asharq Al-Awsat that this ban could potentially escalate tensions into direct conflict between the RSF and Egyptian forces. She expressed concerns over the implications of this decree and its potential to drag the ongoing conflict in Sudan into a broader regional confrontation, possibly involving neighboring Ethiopia. Awad posed a critical question regarding the RSF’s capacity to offer viable alternatives for merchants, indicating uncertainty about who would purchase the banned products and whether there are secure markets beyond Egypt. Additionally, Mohammed Latif, an analyst, opined that the nature of relations between Sudan and Egypt has irrevocably changed due to this ban. In the interim, RSF supporters have circulated videos of goods and livestock being turned away from the Egyptian border, despite an internal decree by Hemedti against the dissemination of images or videos related to RSF operations.

The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) are a paramilitary group in Sudan led by Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, commonly known as Hemedti. The group has gained considerable power, particularly in the context of the ongoing internal conflict in Sudan. Relations between Sudan and Egypt have been historically complex, characterized by cooperation and tension. Recent events have escalated those tensions, particularly as both nations grapple with their respective security and territorial concerns. The RSF’s control over significant regions of Sudan, especially near the border with Egypt, adds another layer of complexity to the situation, particularly regarding trade relations. Official statements from both nations further reflect the heightened diplomatic strain following the allegations of military aggression and the subsequent ban on exports.

In summary, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have instituted a ban on Sudanese exports to Egypt, attributed to perceived provocations by Egypt and escalating allegations of military confrontations. This prohibition signifies a critical juncture in the bilateral relations between Sudan and Egypt, with potential ramifications extending beyond the immediate economic implications. Observers warn that such actions could instigate direct conflicts, risking wider regional instability. As the situation develops, it remains imperative to monitor the responses from both parties and the associated impacts on regional trade and diplomacy.

Original Source: english.aawsat.com