Sudanese Army Refutes UAE’s Claims of Bombing Ambassador’s Residence

The Sudanese army denies accusations from the UAE regarding a bombing of the UAE ambassador’s residence in Khartoum, attributing violence to rebel groups while Kuwait and Jordan condemn the alleged attacks.

The Sudanese armed forces have officially rejected allegations from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) claiming that Sudanese military aircraft bombed the residence of the UAE ambassador in Khartoum. This accusation, which arose from the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs, cites an alleged attack on the ambassador’s residence, prompting the UAE to express its intention to file a protest with the United Nations and relevant regional organizations. This confrontation between the two nations marks a notable increase in tensions, with Sudanese military leaders accusing the UAE of exacerbating the conflict by supplying support to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a prominent Sudanese paramilitary group. In a statement released on Monday, a spokesperson for the Sudanese Armed Forces condemned the UAE’s claims, asserting, “The Sudanese Armed Forces condemn and deny the accusation by the United Arab Emirates of bombing the residence of its ambassador in Khartoum.” The spokesperson stressed that the Sudanese military does not target diplomatic missions or utilize them as points of military operation. According to the statement, the acts of violence were attributed to what was termed the “Terrorist militia of the Daglo rebels,” which allegedly receives backing from entities known globally. The army maintains that its military actions are solely aimed at locations associated with these militias, which is within their right to defend Sudan. The regional situation has soured since April 2024, when armed conflict intensified, leading to the evacuation of all diplomatic missions from Khartoum, with most relocating to Port Sudan on the eastern coast. Sudanese authorities have indicated that the RSF, which has gained control of Khartoum, has perpetrated looting and attacks on foreign embassies without substantial international backlash. In response to the reported attack, both Kuwait and Jordan issued strong condemnations, reiterating the vital need for the protection of diplomatic missions. The Kuwaiti Ministry of Foreign Affairs highlighted the necessity to uphold the sanctity of diplomatic premises as outlined in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961. Furthermore, Jordan’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Sufian Qudah, explicitly condemned the incident, labeling it “a serious violation of international law and an infringement on the sanctity of diplomatic premises.”

The relationship between Sudan and the UAE has become increasingly strained amid the ongoing conflict in Sudan, which has seen intensified fighting since April 2024. This conflict has forced diplomatic missions to abandon Khartoum, leaving many embassies operating from Port Sudan. The UAE’s accusations come in the context of Sudanese military allegations that the UAE is providing military assistance to the RSF. Diplomatic protocols and protections for embassies are enshrined in international law, underscoring the importance of safeguarding diplomatic missions during times of conflict.

In conclusion, the Sudanese army has resolutely denied the UAE’s allegations of bombing the ambassador’s residence, attributing the violence to rebel groups supported by external entities. This development highlights the escalating tensions between Sudan and the UAE amidst the ongoing conflict, which has implications for diplomatic relations and highlights the necessity of international law regarding the protection of diplomatic missions. The condemnations from Kuwait and Jordan further emphasize the seriousness of the attacks on diplomatic properties in conflict zones.

Original Source: sudantribune.com